Thursday, June 27, 2013

Pinchas 5773: Machla, Noa, Chogla, Milcha and Tirtza



In this week’s Torah portion, Moshe (Moses) apportions the Land of Israel as an inheritance to the tribes, to the men and not to the women. “The daughters of Tzelophchad came forward…Machla, Noa, Chogla, Milcha and Tirtza. They stood before Moshe and before Eleazar the Kohen (priest) and before the chieftains and the entire congregation, saying, ‘Our father died in the desert…and he had no sons. Why should our father’s name be eliminated from his family because he had no son? Give us a portion along with our father’s brothers.’” (Bamidbar/Numbers 27:1-4)

The Midrash in Sifrei explains the thought process behind the daughters’ challenge. They contend that human compassion favors males, and that this vastly differs from G-d’s gender-blind compassion. “His mercy extends to all, to the males and to the females, as it is said [in Tehillim/Psalms 145:9] ‘The L-rd is good to all, and His mercy is on all His works.’”

Comments Sarah Schneider in B’Or haTorah Journal: “[The daughters] identified the underlying spiritual principle being violated…Because they were focused on truth and the higher good, they had the strength to persist.”  Talmud (Baba Basra 119b) characterizes the daughters: “They were chachamot (wise women) because they spoke at the proper time.”

Talmud explains that the daughters approach Moshe while he is expounding on the laws of Levirate marriage (See Devarim/Deuteronomy 25:5-10). These laws instruct a childless widow to marry her deceased husband’s brother in order to continue the husband’s name. Talmud relates that the daughters ask hypothetically if their widowed mother could enter into a Levirate marriage in order to conceive a male inheritor. Moshe answers that it is impossible since their mother has already borne children. The daughters point out the contradiction and persuade Moshe to pray to G-d to change the laws of inheritance so they will apply to daughters when there is no son. G-d favorably answers Moshe’s petition and the laws are amended.

Talmud teaches that the laws of inheritance ought to have been taught in the name of Moshe, but were taught instead by the daughters of Tzelophchad because of their special merit. Rebbetzin Chana Bracha Siegelbaum explains in Women at the Crossroads: at a time when all the men but Calev and Yehoshua (Joshua) lose hope of possessing the Land, these women have tremendous faith, and they arise to demand a portion in the Land, their rightful inheritance as descendants of Avraham (Abraham). Like their forefather Yosef (Joseph), who loves the Holy Land so much that he requests that his bones be brought there for burial, Tzelophchad’s daughters also intensely and faithfully love the Land.

Writes Mrs. Schneider: “There is no holier mission than to reveal a Torah law that will influence the behavior of Jews until the end of time…to be the source of one of the 613 mitzvot (commandments) is the highest possible honor.”  



No comments:

Post a Comment